Feedback
  • At senior level feedback should be very limited. These are experienced debaters who do not need the adjudicator’s opinion. Telling students to slow down so the adjudicator can keep up with the argument only exposes the adjudicator to ridicule.
  • At junior level some feedback might be valuable, but only if the comments refer to where marks were gained and lost.
  • Feedback should be given to both teams and the audience rather than privately.

Year 11 Debating Teams 2014 organised by Nicola Littley NLittley@hastingsboys.school.nz
School
Teams
Coach
Napier Boys
1
Catherine Brady CBrady@nbhs.school,nz
Napier Girls
1
Mary-Anne Blair mablair@nghs.school.nz
Sacred Heart
1
James Wakefield JWakefield@sacredheartnapier.school.nz
Taradale
1
Angela Gibbs gi@ths.school.nz
Karamu
2
Amy Price aprice@karamu.school.nz
St Johns


Lindisfarne
1
Kristy Biggs biggs.kristy@lindisfarnehbschool@onmicrosoft.com
Hastings Girls
2
Mandy Jarden jr@hastingsgirls.com
Hastings Boys


Havelock North
1
Chris Thomas ts@hnhs.school.nz
Iona
1
Lisa Jane Easter es@iona.school.nz
Woodford
1
Rachel Roberts rachel.roberts@woodford.school.nz
Central HB
1
Juliette Lewis julietteh@chbc.school.nz
TOTAL no. TEAMS
13


RESULTS ROUND ONE AND TWO
2014 Year 11 Debating Rounds 1 and 2
Round 1, Prepared. Moot: This house would remove the GST on fresh fruits and vegetables before adding a sugar/fat tax.
Affirmative
Negating
NGHS 240
NBHS 256 WINNER
SHC 249 WINNER
Iona 243
Karamu 1 240 WINNER
HGHS 1 224
HNHS 225 WINNER
HGHS 2 192
Karamu 2 230 WINNER
SJC 1 214
Woodford 264 WINNER
SJC 2 247
ROund 2, Limited Prep. Moot: This house would arm the NZ police
Affirmative
Negating
Iona 256 WINNER
NGHS 255
NBHS 238
SHC 241.5 WINNER
HGHS 1 234
Lindisfarne 258 WINNER
HGHS 2 249 WINNER
Karamu 2 218
SJC 1 217
Woodford 233 WINNER
SJC 2 228
Karamu 1 280 WINNER
Taradale 247 WINNER
HNHS 235

Taradale and Lindisfarne only took part in the Limited Prep. CHBC pulled out of this round.

ROUNDS THREE AND FOUR
(HNHS and SHC each had a bye. HNHS was only be involved in the Prepared, SHC in the Limited Prep)

Round 3, Prepared. Moot: This house would vote National over Labour in the 2014 election.
Affirmative
Negating
NGHS 240
NBHS 256 WINNER
SHC 249 WINNER
Iona 243
Karamu 1 240 WINNER
HGHS 1 224
HNHS 225 WINNER
HGHS 2 192
Karamu 2 230 WINNER
SJC 1 214
Woodford 264 WINNER
SJC 2 247


Round 4, Limited Prep. Moot: This house would arm teachers in the USA.

Affirmative
Negating
Karamu 1 236
Taradale 242 WINNER
Karamu 2 261 WINNER
NBHS 235
NGHS 220 WINNER
CHBC 137
Woodford 264 WINNER
HGHS 2 250
SHC 254.5 WINNER
HGHS 1 249
Lindisfarne 259 WINNER
Iona 253.5
Round 5, Limited Prep. Moot: Host's choice

NBHS - BYE

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
Taradale 248 WINNER
Iona 250 WINNER
CHBC 112
HNHS 242
HGHS 1 276 WINNER
NGHS 273
Lindisfarne 266
SHC 270 WINNER
Karamu 1 179
HGHS 2 185 WINNER
Karamu 2 240 WINNER
Woodford 236
Semi Finals: Prepared - This House supports drilling in NZ waters
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE

Woodford 277 WINNER
Taradale 27

SHC 269
Karamu 2 271 WINNER
FINAL: Limited Prep - That advertising during kid's television shows should be banned

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE

Woodford 279
Karamu 2 294 WINNER

OVERALL WINNER IN 2014 IS KARAMU 2.

2014 Year 12 and 13 Debating Competition
2014 Senior Debating Teams in Hawke’s Bay.
To make it easier to coordinate school teams are numbered and the main contact is named.
Could these schools’ debating coordinators forward information to the other coaches in their schools please?Thanks Lyndie Balfour.

CHBC 1, 2 contact by Judith Finlay judithf@chbc.school.nz
HBHS 1 contact Nicola Littley at NicolaL@hastingsboys.school.nz
HGHS 1, 2 & 3 contact Mandy Jarden jr@hastingsgirls.com
HNHS 1 & 2 contact John Bird bd@hnhs.school.nz
Iona 2 contact Lisa-Jane Easter es@iona.school.nz
KHS 1, 2, 3 Amy Price aprice@karamu.school.nz
LC 1, 2, 3, contact Fraser Harrison. harrison.fraser@lindisfarne.hb.school.nz
NBHS 1, 2, 3 contact Sarah Robertson srobertson@nbhs.school.nz
NGHS 1 & 2 contact Zanita Thompson zthompson@nghs.school.nz
SHC 1 contact James Wakefield jwakefield@sacredheartnapier.school.nz
SJC 1, 2 & 3 Lyndie Balfour lbalfour@stjohns.school.nz
THS 1, 2 contact Robyn Elston r.elston@ths.school.nz
Woodford 1 contact Rachel Roberts Rachel.roberts@woodford.school.nz

Round 1 The moot is a judgement moot
‘This house supports building the Ruataniwha Dam
Pool A Hosted by Lindisfarne College-Fraser Harrison in Week 6
Limited Prep Moot was 'that we should change the N.Z. flag'
Round 1 Prepared Round 2 Limited Prep
Affirmative Negative Affirmative Negative
HGHS 1
LC1 won
LC 1 won
WH1
CHBC 2
HGHS 2 won
HGHS 2 won
HNHS 1
HNHS 1
HGHS 3 won
HGHS 3 won
LC 3
LC 3
HNHS 2 won
HNHS 2
HGHS 1 won
LC 2 won
by def CHBC


WH 1
HBHS 1 won
HBHS 1 won
LC2
CHBC did not arrive so the draw was changed.

Pool B Hosted by SJC-Lyndie Balfour on Tuesday 18th March 2014
'Round 1 Prepared Round 2 Limited Prep
The limited prep moot was 'that this house should ban zoos.'
Affirmative Negative Affirmative Negative
SJC 1
IONA 1 won
IONA 1
IONA 2won
SJC 2
KHS 1 won
KHS 1
SJC 1 won
SJC 3
KHS 2 won
KHS 2 won
SJC 2
IONA 2 won
KHS 3
KHS 3 won
SJC 3





Pool C Hosted by NGHS in Week 7-Zanita Thompson
The Limited Prep Moot used was 'That school balls are an outdated tradition."
Round 1 Prepared Round 2 Limited Prep

Affirmative Negative Affirmative Negative

THS 1
NBHS 1 won
NBHS 1 won
THS 2
NBHS 2
NGHS 1 won
NGHS 1 won
THS 1
NGHS 2 won
NBHS 3
NBHS 3
NBHS 2 won
THS 2 Def.
SHC 1 won by def
SHC 1
NGHS 2 won








external image uVO0QINY94bDfIJbp04mLByreZ9G0SQoK3qcSRup-Vp3k8iw-SpmEwaZDRegonKzjTQ3tqZFNfXRCyO5qQCjDRSOipOTBerocEoPXZ5ENC7iWO7MMbay_t4NMir9Ow

2014 Term 2 Year 12/13 Rounds 3 & 4-Week 8 from 23rd to 27th June

The prepared moot is 'that politics is an admirable profession'


Pool A Hosted by NBHS
Round 3 Prepared Debate...Round 4 Limited Prep
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
NBHS 1 won
HNHS 1
HNHS 1
NBHS 2 won
NBHS 2 won
HNHS 2
HNHS 2 won
NBHS 3
NBHS 3
WH 1 won
WH 1
NBHS 1 won

Pool B Hosted by SJC on Wed 25th June or Fri 27th June??
Round 3 Prepared Debate... Round 4 Limited Prep moot was America's Cup challenge should be privately funded.
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
SJC 1 won 260
CHBC 1 245
CHBC 1 280
SJC 2 won 284
SJC 2 won 287
CHBC 2 271
CHBC 2 won 242
SJC 3 240
SJC 3 254
HBHS 1 won 257
HBHS 1 237
SJC 1 won 253

Pool C hosted by NGHS
Round 3 Prepared Debate... Round 4 Limited Prep
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
NGHS 1
LC 1
LC 1
SHC 1
NGHS 2
LC 2
LC 2
NGHS 1
SHC 1
LC 3
LC 3
NGHS 2

Pool D hosted KHS
Round 3 Prepared Debate...Round 4 Limited Prep
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
KHS 1 241 Won
HGHS 1 239
HGHS 1 236
KHS 2 243 Won
KHS 2 273
HGHS 2 284 Won
HGHS 2 257
KHS 3 306 Won
KHS 3 236 Won
HGHS 3 184
HGHS 3 233
KHS 1 271 Won

Pool E-hosted by THS.
Round 3 Prepared Debate..Round 4 Limited Prep
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
THS 1
IONA 1 won
IONA 1 won
THS 2
THS 2 won
IONA 2
IONA 2
THS 1 won

Term 3 Year 12/13 Round 5 Limited Preparation
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE

CHBC 1
HNHS 1

CHBC 2
HNHS 2





AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
HGHS 1
NBHS 1
HGHS 2
NBHS 2
HGHS 3
NBHS 3

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
IONA 1
WH1
IONA 2
HBHS 1

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
KHS 1
NGHS 1
KHS 2
NGHS 2
KHS 3
SHC 1

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
LC 1
SJC 1
LC 2
SJC 2
LC 3
SJC 3

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
THS 1
THS 2






























































AFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE






















AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE

















Pool 3 Hosted by ....Limited Prep moot

AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE









Pool 4 Hosted by
Prepared Debate
Limited Prep Debate
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
















Term 3
These debates are limited preparation debates.
AFFIRMATIVE
NEGATIVE
Won
Moot





























































































Term 1 2013 Results Year 11
Round 1 – Prepared (MOOT: This house believes THAT schools are obsolete.)
THS - 303 v HGHS 2 – 250 win to THS
CHBC 1 - 219 v LFC – 241 win to LFC
HGHS 1 - 273 v CHBC 2 – 251 win to HGHS 1
NGHS 1 310 KHS 2 321 win to KHS 2
NGHS 2 259 HBHS 238 win to NGHS 2
KHS 1 262 SJC 242 win to KHS 1

NBHS 1 - 262 v HNHS 241 win to NBHS 1
SHC – n/a v NBHS 2 – n/a win to NBHS 2
NBHS 3 - 198 v WFH - 219 win to Woodford

Round 2 Limited Preparation (MOOT: This house believes THAT it is time for the Government to tax unhealthy food.)
LFC - 247 v HGHS 1 – 316 win to HGHS 1
THS - 266 v CHBC 2 – 288 win to CHBC 2
HGHS 2 - 288 v CHBC 1 – 317 win to CHBC 1

SJC 259 NGHS 1 271 win to NGHS 1
HBHS n/a KHS 2 n/a win to KHS 2
KHS 1 267 NGHS 2 243 win to KHS 1

NBHS 2 - 260 v NBHS 1 – 264 win to NBHS 1
HNHS – 261 v NBHS 3 – 234 win to HNHS
WFH – 216 v SHC – 241 win to SHC


Term 2 2013 Results – Year 11 Debating

Round 3 Prepared: (MOOT: That New Zealand's Future Looks Bright)

HNHS vs NGHS 1 win to HNHS 238-233
HGHS 2 vs WFD win to HGHS 265-244
NGHS 2 vs HGHS 1 win to HGHS 253.5- 253

SJC vs THS win to SJC 257 – 244
HBHS vs NBHS1 win to NBHS1 281 – 247
NBHS2 vs LFC win to NBHS2 251 - 244

KHS2 v Iona – Won by KHS2
CHBC2 v KHS1 – Won by KHS1
CHBC1 v SHC – Won by CHBC1


Round 4 Limited Prep: (MOOT: That synthetic highs should be criminalised)

NGHS 1 vs HGHS 2 win to NGHS 245-241
WFD vs NGHS 2 win to WFD 207.5-207
HGHS 1 vs HNHS win to HGHS 307- 292

LFC vs HBHS win to HBHS 211 – 210
NBHS1 vs SJC win to NBHS1 243 – 239
THS vs NBHS2 win to NBHS 223 – 195

CHBC1 v KHS2 – Won by KHS2
CHBC2 v Iona - Won by CHBC2
KHS1 v SHC – Won by KHS1

Year 11 Debating Results Term 3 Rounds 5 and 6

Prepared Debate: THAT citizens should be legally allowed to step in on behalf of the police if a situation calls for it”
IONA vs HGHS 2 win to HGHS 2 297-294
KHS vs HNHS win to KHS 1 266 - 256
NGHS vs KHS 2 win to KHS 229 - 223
NGHS vs HGHS 1 win to HGHS 1 322 - 269

LFC 252 vs NBHS 251 - Winner: LFC
NBHS 272 vs THS 262 - Winner: NBHS
WFH 253 vs HBHS 271 - Winner: HBHS
Limited prep: THAT life was better before the internet.

HGHS 2 vs NGHS 1 win to NGHS1 253 - 249
NGHS 2 vs IONA win to IONA 252 - 219
KHS 1 vs HGHS 1 win to HGHS 1 307 - 289
HNHS vs KHS 2 win to KHS 267 - 263.5

NBHS (2) 255 vs WFH 243 - Winner: NBHS (2)
THS 242 vs THS 240 - Winner: THS
HBHS 243 vs NBHS (1) 254 - Winner: NBHS (1)

Year 11 FINALS - (all with 6 wins each): HGHS 1, NBHS 1 and KHS.

Year 11 Debating TERM 3 DRAW Rounds 5 and 6
HOST: Lindisfarne College
DATE: Weds 11 September 2013
Round 5 – Prepared
AFF
NEG
LFC
NGHS 2
NGHS 1
THS
default
SJC
WFH
HBHS

Round 6 – Limited Preparation
AFF
NEG
NGHS 2
default
THS
LFC
SJC
WFH
HBHS
NGHS 1

_

HOST: Hastings Girls’ High School
DATE: Thurs 12 September 2013
Round 5 – Prepared
AFF
NEG
HGHS 1
NBHS 2
IONA
HGHS 2
NBHS 1
KHS 2
KHS 1
HNHS

Round 6 – Limited Preparation
AFF
NEG
KHS 2
HGHS 1
NBHS 2
IONA
IONA
NBHS 1
HNHS
KHS 1

Moot: THAT "Citizens should be legally allowed to step in on behalf of the police if a situation requires it."
This is a CHANGE debate so teams will need to develop/address a model.








To enter results, or follow discussion topics, click on the 'Discussion' tab above. For results, choose the discussion "format for posting results".

Notices.Term 1

General Information,

Moots, Dates and Senior Draws

**Results**

Limited Preparation Rounds